Strength Science

Strength Science

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Best Squat Variation for Strength and Muscle Size in Trained Women

Best Squat Variation for Strength and Muscle Size in Trained Women

Comparing the effects of front and back squats.

Danny James's avatar
Danny James
Jun 11, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Best Squat Variation for Strength and Muscle Size in Trained Women
2
Share
Fit female athlete wearing light blue preparing to barbell back squat in a dark gym with light blue fluorescent lighting.
Image created using Midjourney.

Have you ever wondered whether front squats or back squats are better for building leg strength and muscle size? For recreationally trained women, choosing the right squat variation can be confusing, especially when the goal is to maximise strength and quadriceps hypertrophy.

This study provides clear insights by directly comparing these two popular squat types over a 12-week training period.

Key Points

Aim

The study aimed to investigate how front squats (FS) versus back squats (BS) affect lower limb muscle strength and regional quadriceps hypertrophy in recreationally trained females.

Methods

  • Participants: 24 recreationally trained women (aged 18–30) randomised into FS (n=12) or BS (n=12) groups.

  • Training Protocol: 12 weeks, twice-weekly sessions, with individualised training volume based on previous quadriceps training.

  • Assessments: Maximum dynamic strength (1-RM) was tested on a 45° leg press (a neutral, nonspecific strength test) and muscle thickness was measured by ultrasound at the proximal, middle, and distal regions of the lateral thigh.

  • Design: Randomised, repeated-measures, parallel-group design with baseline and post-training measurements.

Results

  • Strength Gains: Back squat training resulted in significantly greater improvements in 1-RM leg press strength compared to front squat training (p=0.048).

  • Muscle Hypertrophy: Both squat variations produced similar increases in muscle thickness across all measured regions of the lateral thigh, with no significant differences between groups.

  • Training Volume: Back squats allowed for higher absolute loads, but total training volume was monitored without strict equating to maintain real-world applicability.


Related

Front Squat vs Back Squat

Front Squat vs Back Squat

Danny James
·
September 26, 2024
Read full story
Knees Out vs Knees In: Which Squat Technique Is Best?

Knees Out vs Knees In: Which Squat Technique Is Best?

Danny James
·
October 10, 2024
Read full story
Rear Foot Elevated Split Squats vs Back Squats

Rear Foot Elevated Split Squats vs Back Squats

Danny James
·
October 30, 2024
Read full story
Back Squat vs Hex-Bar Deadlift

Back Squat vs Hex-Bar Deadlift

Danny James
·
Jan 16
Read full story
Squats and Hip Thrusts Cause Similar Glute Muscle Growth

Squats and Hip Thrusts Cause Similar Glute Muscle Growth

Danny James
·
November 28, 2024
Read full story

Key Takeaways

  • If your primary goal is to increase lower limb strength in a general, nonspecific way, incorporating back squats may offer superior benefits compared to front squats.

  • For building quadriceps muscle size, both front and back squats are equally effective, so the choice can be based on personal preference, comfort, or specific biomechanical considerations.

  • Since back squats allow heavier loads, they might be better suited for those aiming to maximise strength, while front squats, which place less stress on the lumbar spine and knees, can be a safer alternative without sacrificing hypertrophy gains.

  • Using a neutral strength test like the leg press helps assess overall strength improvements without bias towards the trained squat variation.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Strength Science
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share