Strength Science

Strength Science

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Hip Flexion Angle and Leg Extensions
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Hip Flexion Angle and Leg Extensions

Effects on longitudinal muscle activity of the rectus femoris during leg extensions.

Danny James's avatar
Danny James
Jan 20, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Hip Flexion Angle and Leg Extensions
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
Fit muscular male athlete on lying leg extensions in a dark gym with light blue fluorescent lighting.
Image created by author using Midjourney

The study "Hip flexion angle affects longitudinal muscle activity of the rectus femoris in leg extension exercise" investigates how varying hip flexion angles (HFA) influence the activity of the rectus femoris (RF) muscle during leg extension exercises (LEE).

PMID: 36795130

Key Points

Aim: The primary aim of the study was to determine the effect of different hip flexion angles on the longitudinal muscle activity of the rectus femoris during isotonic leg extension exercises.

Methods

  • Participants: Nine male bodybuilders were recruited for this acute study.

  • Exercise Protocol: Participants performed isotonic LEE using a leg extension machine at three different hip flexion angles: 0°, 40°, and 80°. Each participant executed four sets of ten repetitions at 70% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), extending their knees from 90° to 0°.

  • Measurements: The transverse relaxation time (T2) of the RF was measured before and after the exercise using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The study analysed changes in T2 values across the proximal, middle, and distal regions of the RF. Additionally, subjective sensations of muscle contraction were assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and compared to T2 values.

Results

  • At a hip flexion angle of 80°, the T2 value in the middle RF was significantly lower than that in the distal RF (p < 0.05).

  • The T2 values at 0° and 40° HFA were higher than those at 80° HFA in both proximal (p < 0.05 for 0°, p < 0.01 for 40°) and middle RF regions (p < 0.01 for both).

  • The subjective NRS scores did not align consistently with the objective T2 measurements, indicating discrepancies between perceived muscle contraction and actual muscle activity.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Strength Science
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More