Sometimes Gluten Sensitivity Isn't Real, New Research Confirms
Finds no evidence gluten causes symptoms.
📢 Quick heads-up: Just a few days left! For the rest of the month, you can lock in a lifetime subscription to Strength Science. That’s a one-time payment for unlimited access to the FULL archive. Grab it here and enter this coupon code bfss for a little treat. 💪
Think gluten is the culprit behind your digestive issues? This study challenges everything we thought we knew about non-coeliac gluten sensitivity, suggesting that at times, the problem might be more in our heads than in our bread.
This randomised crossover trial investigated whether gluten truly causes symptoms in people with self-reported non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) by comparing acute (single dose) and sub-acute (5-day) gluten challenges against placebo in both NCGS individuals and healthy controls.
Study Design
The study enrolled 20 healthy controls (mean age 30 years, 15% men) and 16 individuals with NCGS (mean age 33 years, 31% men) in a single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled crossover design. Participants received either 16 grams of gluten or whey protein (placebo) mixed in yogurt for the acute challenge, followed by gluten-containing or gluten-free muffins (16 grams of gluten daily) for 5 consecutive days. The study measured psychological symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, intestinal permeability, inflammation markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), and cortisol awakening response.
Key Findings
Psychological Differences at Baseline: Individuals with NCGS showed significantly higher negative affect scores (p = 0.01) and lower positive affect scores (p = 0.04) compared to healthy controls before any challenges began. This baseline psychological difference existed regardless of gluten exposure.
No Gluten-Specific Effects on Gastrointestinal Symptoms: After sub-acute administration, NCGS participants reported significantly stronger increases in bloating (p = 0.001) and abdominal pain (p < 0.001) compared to healthy controls, but these symptoms occurred equally with both gluten and placebo. No significant group-by-nutrient interactions were observed, meaning symptoms weren’t specifically triggered by gluten.
Fatigue Responses Not Gluten-Specific: After acute challenge, NCGS individuals showed significantly stronger increases in fatigue scores (p = 0.03) compared to healthy controls, regardless of whether they received gluten or placebo. During sub-acute administration, no differences in fatigue were observed between groups or nutrients.
Tension Effects Applied to Everyone: Both healthy controls and NCGS participants experienced higher tension scores after gluten compared to placebo during acute (p = 0.01) and sub-acute (p = 0.05) challenges. This was the only nutrient-specific effect found, and it affected everyone equally.
Strong Nocebo Effect: The study revealed that 56% of individuals with NCGS reported symptoms during placebo administration that they incorrectly attributed to gluten. Blinding was technically successful, with only 50% of all participants correctly identifying the intervention order (7 out of 16 NCGS individuals correctly identified the order).
Biological Markers
None of the hypothesised biological mechanisms showed gluten-specific changes:
Intestinal Permeability: No differences in lactulose-mannitol ratio between gluten and placebo after sub-acute administration (p = 0.18).
Inflammation: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels did not differ between gluten or placebo (p = 0.60) or between groups (p = 0.51).
Cortisol Response: Cortisol awakening response showed no differences between nutrients (p = 0.76) or groups (p = 0.52).
Practical Takeaways
Reconsider the Gluten-Free Approach: If you’ve been avoiding gluten based on self-diagnosis, this study suggests your symptoms may not be gluten-specific. The complete absence of gluten-specific effects in this controlled trial indicates that other factors are likely driving your symptoms.