Strength Science

Strength Science

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Bicep Curls Decoded: The Science Behind Your Arm Day
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Bicep Curls Decoded: The Science Behind Your Arm Day

Research compares traditional, hammer, and reverse dumbbell curls, uncovering surprising muscle activation patterns.

Danny James's avatar
Danny James
May 05, 2025
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Bicep Curls Decoded: The Science Behind Your Arm Day
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share
Male bodybuilder wearing a light blue t-shirt doing dumbbell bicep curls in a dark modern gym with blue fluorescent lighting.
Image created using Midjourney.

This study investigates the effectiveness of different bicep curl variations on muscle activation and performance in trained men. The research compares traditional, hammer, and reverse dumbbell bicep curls to determine their impact on specific muscle groups and repetition capacity.

Key Points

Aim: To compare electromyographic (EMG) activation and repetition count during traditional, hammer, and reverse dumbbell bicep curls in trained men.

Methods:

  • Participants: 30 trained men with at least one year of fitness experience

  • Exercises: Traditional, hammer, and reverse bicep curls (randomised order)

  • Measurements: EMG readings of biceps brachii and brachialis, number of repetitions completed

Key Results

  1. Biceps Brachii Activation:

    • Highest: Traditional bicep curl

    • Moderate: Hammer curl

    • Lowest: Reverse curl

  2. Brachialis Activation:

    • Highest: Reverse curl

    • Lower: Hammer and traditional curls

  3. Repetition Count:

    • Highest: Hammer curl

    • Moderate: Traditional curl

    • Lowest: Reverse curl

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Strength Science
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More