Strength Science

Strength Science

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Can Minimalist Training Be Effective?

Can Minimalist Training Be Effective?

A narrative review.

Danny James's avatar
Danny James
Jun 09, 2025
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Strength Science
Strength Science
Can Minimalist Training Be Effective?
1
Share
Beginner female lifter wearing light blue getting ready to deadlift in the gym with minimalist training.
Image created using Midjourney.

This narrative review explores whether minimalist resistance training (RT)-using less frequent, lower-volume, or lower-intensity workouts-can still provide meaningful improvements in physical fitness, especially for beginners and those not meeting standard exercise recommendations.

PMID: 37924459

Key Points

Aim

The review aimed to identify the lowest effective resistance training "dose" (frequency, intensity, sets, reps) that can still improve fitness components such as muscle strength and endurance in sedentary individuals or beginners.

Methods

  • Narrative review (not a meta-analysis) due to the high variability in study protocols and outcome measures.

  • Synthesised findings from original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses on RT dosage and its effects on fitness and health.

Key Findings

1. Minimal Effective Dose for Beginners

  • Frequency: One RT session per week is sufficient to induce strength gains in beginners for at least the first 8–12 weeks.

  • Volume: Less than three sets per exercise.

  • Intensity: Loads below 50% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) can still be effective, though higher intensities (up to 80% 1RM) provide greater benefits.

  • Type: Multi-joint (compound) exercises are as effective, if not more so, than single-joint exercises for overall strength and fitness gains.

  • Repetitions: The optimal number of repetitions is debated; some studies suggest training to failure is necessary, while others report similar adaptations with fewer reps.

2. Health and Performance Benefits

  • Minimalist RT is associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes (10–17% reduction).

  • RT improves body composition, bone health, mobility, balance, cognitive function, and mental health.

  • Even very low-intensity activities, such as prolonged static stretching (>10 minutes per muscle group), can improve strength and hypertrophy but require much longer sessions.

3. Adherence and Practicality

  • Lack of time and motivation are major barriers to regular RT participation.

  • Minimalist RT protocols may improve adherence by reducing the time and effort required.

  • After 8–12 weeks, progression (increasing frequency, volume, or intensity) may be necessary to continue making gains.


Related

What's the Least Amount of Training Needed to Build Strength

What's the Least Amount of Training Needed to Build Strength

Danny James
·
Mar 5
Read full story
Increasing Training Volume May Not Always Be Better

Increasing Training Volume May Not Always Be Better

Danny James
·
May 19
Read full story
High Volume v Moderate Volume Resistance Training for Preserving Muscle During Caloric Restriction

High Volume v Moderate Volume Resistance Training for Preserving Muscle During Caloric Restriction

Danny James
·
May 8
Read full story
Exploring the Resistance Training Dose Response

Exploring the Resistance Training Dose Response

Danny James
·
December 9, 2024
Read full story
Long or Shorter Training Sessions: Does Session Length Matter?

Long or Shorter Training Sessions: Does Session Length Matter?

Danny James
·
October 28, 2024
Read full story
How Much Physical Activity Does it Take to Live Longer?

How Much Physical Activity Does it Take to Live Longer?

Danny James
·
Mar 3
Read full story

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Strength Science
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share