Are Organic Foods Really More Nutritious?
Is it hype or health? A large-scale systematic review.
Are organic foods really more nutritious, or is it just hype? If you’ve ever wondered whether the higher price tag on organic fruits and veggies actually buys you more nutrients, you’re not alone. This large-scale systematic review from 2024 dives deep into the science to settle the debate.
Quick Summary
This comprehensive review of 147 studies (over 1,700 samples) found no consistent, generalisable evidence that organic foods are more nutritious than conventional ones. Differences in nutrients were highly specific to certain foods and nutrients, not universal.
Study Aim
To clarify whether organic foods are nutritionally superior to conventional foods by synthesising scientific evidence from a wide range of published studies.
Methods
Systematic review of 147 peer-reviewed articles published between 1990 and 2020.
Compared organic vs. conventional foods (fruits, vegetables, cereals, pulses, etc.).
Included 656 comparative analyses covering 68 food types and 22 nutritional properties (macronutrients, micronutrients, some phytochemicals) plus 9 residue parameters (like heavy metals, nitrate, nitrite).
Only included studies with quantitative lab analyses of fresh, plant-based foods.
Results
Significant differences between organic and conventional foods were found in 29.1% of comparisons.
No significant difference was found in 41.9% of comparisons.
Mixed results (some studies found differences, others didn’t) in 29.0% of comparisons.
No universal pattern: Sometimes organic was higher in certain nutrients (e.g., vitamin C in some fruits), sometimes conventional was higher, and most often, there was no difference.
Residues: Organic foods generally had lower nitrate and nitrite levels, but heavy metal content differences were inconsistent.
No clear superiority: The study found no generalisable evidence that organic foods are consistently more nutritious across the board.
Related
Practical Takeaways
Don’t assume “organic” always means more nutritious—it depends on the specific food and nutrient.
If you buy organic for lower pesticide or nitrate residues, there is some evidence this may be true, but for nutrients like protein, fiber, vitamins, and minerals, the difference is usually negligible.
Eat more fruits and vegetables, period. Whether organic or conventional, the health benefits of plant foods far outweigh minor differences in nutrient content.
If budget is a concern, conventional produce is still a highly nutritious choice.
Key Takeaways
No blanket nutritional superiority: Organic foods are not universally more nutritious than conventional ones.
Nutrient differences are food and nutrient-specific, not consistent across all foods.
Consumer perceptions of organic foods’ nutritional superiority are not strongly supported by scientific evidence.
Choose organic if you prefer it for environmental or residue reasons, but don’t expect major nutritional benefits.
Focus on the variety and quantity of plant foods in your diet, not just the organic label.
Bottom line:
If you’re eating plenty of fruits, veggies, and whole grains—whether organic or not—you’re making a great choice for your health. The organic label doesn’t guarantee more nutrients, so shop according to your preferences, values, and budget.
Reference
de Oliveira Faoro, D. T., Artuzo, F. D., Rossi Borges, J. A., Foguesatto, C. R., Dewes, H., & Talamini, E. (2024). Are organics more nutritious than conventional foods? A comprehensive systematic review. Heliyon, 10, e28288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28288
You can also find me at dannyleejames.com for more personal stories, training advice and coaching